Final CATME survey should be released today
Please fill out your Course evaluations!

The information here is for teams that haven't reached 100 points.

If your team isn’t yet at 100 points:

Do a standup
Look at the PRs you have and get everything code reviewed that’s ready to be code reviewed
Work to get things merged

Today

Work on Videos
Work on Release Notes

Final CATME survey, and the end of quarter post-survey

You’ll get a link to final CATME survey soon
Link to post survey (for extra credit) will be showing up on Slack and Canvas soon.

If you did not fill out the pre-survey, but would still like to do so for extra credit, and/or to offer your informed consent to allow us to use your data for research, let me know via Slack DM and I’ll send you the link. You can also find the pre-survey link on the home page of the course on Canvas.

Getting PRs merged

Let me encourage you to take the PR that’s at the head of the queue (i.e. the oldest one for your team), and if it’s in a mergeable state (i.e. passing CI/CD, has peer code review, no outstanding changes requested) then deploy it to your QA branch, with a post like this one:

Merge Conflicts

Also, periodically, go through your PR queue (there’s a link on each team’s slack channel for convenience), and look at each PR for your team. If you see this, then there are merge conflicts.

If you can, fix them yourself. If you can’t then mark the PR with the “merge conflicts” label, and ping the person on your team that can fix them.

Out of date branches

If you see this:

Then click to update the branch:

All of this will help all of us get done with this final project (and the grading thereof) much more quickly!

About the Release Notes

Release notes

Release Notes

You are required to prepare a set of release notes as a team.

You may prepare these in one of two ways:

As a Google Drive document in your Drive folder called Release Notes (in the same folder where your retros go), OR
In Markdown format in a file /docs/release_notes.md in a new branch of your repo called release_notes. If you choose this route, make a Pull Request for this change (the normal PR deadline doesn’t apply to this PR).

The choice is up to you: each method has its pros and cons; do whatever seems easiest to you.

What goes in the release notes

The release notes should summarize:

For the actual users of the application, a summary of what changes they notice from the way the app was at the start of the course to now.
In a separate, shorter section: for the developers of the application, a summary of any additional changes devs may need to be aware of.
It does not have to be every single last detail of every change; it should focus on the big picture of things users/developers would need or want to know.
Before and after screenshots can be helpful.

For more information, see this section of the lecture notes from M23:

https://ucsb-cs156.github.io/m23/lectures/week07b/#brief-discussion-of-release-notes

How to submit

Work colletively on this as a team. When finished, submit a link to either your Google Drive doc, or to your PR on Canvas under the assignment ReleaseNotes

For the due date, refer to the Release Notes assignment on Canvas.

About the Final Presentations

Notes about the final presentation

The final presentation should be a team effort, and should highlight all of the PRs that got merged into the main branch.

Make a video of between 5-8 minutes (see guidelines below) and submit the link on Gauchospace.

Limit your presentation to 5-8 minutes. 8 minutes is a hard upper limit.

Highlight the work from an end user perspective first.

That is:

The best thing is to show how an end user would use the feature
The next best thing is to show either a front or backend component in isolation, for example:
- If there is a front end component that is not active in the app yet, you can show it in Storybook
- If there is a backend API, but the functionality isn’t available in the user interface yet, you can demo it in Swagger.
Show internals of code only after explaining the user facing functions, and even then, only if you have left over time.

Instructions for your video:

Here’s a tutorial video on making demo videos from CS48 S20 (Video inception)

Based on the experience of CS48 students, pre-recording is strongly recommended. You will know for sure in advance whether the demo is successful, and whether or not you’ve hit the target length of 5-8 minutes.

Your video should be 5 to 8 minutes long, and cover these points:

First, mention the names of the members of the team, and introduce the person narrating the video.
- It is ok if all the team members appear in the video. It is also ok if only one person narrates the video on behalf of the team.
Second, go through each of the features that your team worked on that were merged into main
- Only demo the features that were merged into main
- Focus in this part of the video on demoing the features from a user perspective, not on the technical details of how they were implemented.
Next, if there is time remaining to reach the 5-10 minute mark, you may briefly cover any technical and/or non-technical challenges your team faced
- You don’t have to cover everything.
- You don’t really even have to include this part if your demo already hits the 5-10 minute range.
- If you do include this part, focus on the items that you think would be interesting to the audience (fellow students in CS156 M23, and the staff of CS156 M23, and potential users of the software you worked on).
- Possible items to include
  - Particularly interesting technical details of what you had to write in the code
  - Challenges in testing
  - Challenges in team communication and organization, and what you did to overcome those
Optional: at the end, if you like, you may thank anyone that was particularly helpful to the team from the staff (TAs and LAs, or students from other teams).
- Please don’t include thanks to me (Prof. Conrad) in the video; I don’t want this to be an exercise in brown-nosing.
- If you do want to express gratitude, feel free to share your thoughts with me on the Slack, by email, etc.

Please then also poll your team members and come to a consensus about the privacy of your final video. Include this in your submission on Canvas.

(a) We give permission only for course staff, and the students in CS156 this quarter to see this video
(b) We give permission for this video to be shared with current and future CS156 students only.
(c) Anyone may see this video (a link to it may be posted on the public course website)

Example Videos (these teams gave me permission to share them publically)

These videos are available to CS156 students/staff only (restricted via Canvas login)

m23-10am-1-happycows [Available to CS156 students/staff only)

About the Final Exam

Notes about the final exam

The final exam will be an online take home exam, and will be mainly high level questions about the process of software development that you learned in team01, team02, team03 and the legacy code project.

There may be questions about any of the following. If you’ve been paying attention all along, you shouldn’t really need to “cram”. The answers should be pretty much in your knowledge base already.

Agile processes, e.g. standups, retrospectives, the role of a product owner/manager
GitHub tools and their interaction with Agile processes: using feature branches, issues, Kanban board, Pull requests, code review
General Web Development concepts, e.g.: Backend vs. Frontend
Some Spring Boot specifics: controllers, services, use of Swagger
Some React specifics: components, use of Storybook
Testing in general: unit testing, test coverage, mutation testing
Spring Boot Testing: Role of JUnit, Jacoco, Pitest, Mocking and Stubbing
React Testing: role of jest, and Stryker
Using third party APIs and representing data with JSON (as we did in team01, and later phases as well.)

I’ll be asking questions about these topics that I think are the type you might be asked as a job interview. So if you study, study the way you would for a job interview.

Please do not collaborate on your exam answers.

Identical text is unlikely to occur if each of you is working indepenently and writing in your own words.
If you are copying/pasting text from an online source (e.g. to explain what a retrospective is) be sure that you use “quotation marks” around direct quotations, and cite your source.

Otherwise, you are liable to end up triggering the suspicion of academic dishonesty because of the similarity of your text to someone else that happens to be using the same source.

Also: relying too much on direct quotes rather than putting things in your own words may result in lower grades; if you have to quote others too much, it suggests that you have not really internalized the content, but have to rely on others understanding. So use direct quotes sparingly, if at all; try instead to answer in your own words.

Academic integrity investigations are unpleasant for everyone, and they don’t help anyone learn.

I really dont want to spend my time on those, so please don’t create conditions where I have to do that.

Work independently, and let your learning speak for itself.

Clarity and consiseness counts

Small grammar / spelling errors may or may not be penalized; if an interviewer would be confused by the answer, or have some doubt as to your understanding, then they count. If there is no doubt about your understanding, I’m liable to be more lenient.
Make sure your answers are clear and understandable.
Do not just do an information dump of everything you know about the topic, or everything you can possibly find online about the topic. An employer wants someone to answer
their question, and they also want someone that makes good use of their time. Don’t waste the interviewer’s time.